SAVANNAH CITY GOVERNMENT

SUMMARY/FINAL MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

May 28, 2020 – 6:30 p.m.

Due to the Coronavirus Pandemic, the regular meeting of the City Council was held at 6:35 p.m., via Zoom video communications. Mayor Johnson requested Ms. Barbara Rudolph, member of the Baha’i Faith to offer a prayer.  The pledge of alliegiance was recited in unison, led by Mayor Johnson.

PRESENT:   Mayor Van R. Johnson, II, Presiding

Alderwoman Kesha Gibson-Carter, At-Large, Post 1, Chairman

Alderwoman Alicia Miller Blakely, At-Large, Post 2

Alderwoman Bernetta B. Lanier, District 1

Alderman Detric Leggett, District  2

Alderwoman Linda Wilder-Bryan, District 3

Alderman Nick Palumbo, District 4, Vice-Chairman

Alderwoman Dr. Estella Edwards Shabazz, District 5, Mayor Pro-Tem

Alderman Kurtis Purtee, District 6

OTHERS PRESENT:

City Manager Pat Monahan

Interim Chief Operating Officer Brett Bell

Planning & Urban Design Director Bridget Lidy

City Attorney Bates Lovett

Clerk of Council Mark Massey

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to adopt/approve the regular meeting agenda for May 28, 2020 as presented, Alderwoman Lanier seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #2, #3, #4 and #5, Alderman Palumbo seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #2, #3, #4 and #5, Alderman Palumbo seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #2, #3, #4 and #5, Alderman Palumbo seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #2, #3, #4 and #5, Alderman Palumbo seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely raised concerns about the sound volume of the Zoom meeting on the City's webpage.

READ by Mayor Johnson and PRESENTED to Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan on behalf of Moms Demand Action.  He also asked everyone to wear orange next week.  He further discussed the killing of George Floyd, how it affected him personally, and how it will shape his ideas regarding proper use of policing and police training in an effort to prevent it from happening in Savannah.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan issued Kudos to Moms Demand Action.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz thanked the Mayor for his comments and she is in total agreement.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated that the best way to approach this issue is to be proactive.  In an effort to foster a better opportunity in the City of Savannah amongst its police department, she recommended best practice polices which have been adopted around the country in the areas of bystander intervention with their colleagues.  This strategy will foster safety and accountability.

Alderman Purtee stated it has been seen all over the United States and the World.  What those officers did was a complete lack of respect, ethics and integrity.  There is no place for those kind of individuals in law enforcement.  Watching the video made him sick.  Knowing how to act quickly is what is going to save a persons life.  Just because a person is arrested does not mean we treat them as less human.

Mayor Johnson advised that President Obama had a taskforce on 21st Century Policing, with a variety of forms and measures.  The City of Savannah has adopted this policy.  He stated it may be wise to have the Chief to come and talk about what our officers do in terms of training, handling mental health issues and disabilities.  He further stated that this could be good for members of the Council and the public at-large.  Because of video, we had an opportunity to see what occurred.

City Manager Monahan indicated that he will schedule the Chief for a presentation, per the Mayor's request.  He reminded everyone the City of Savannah maintains CALEA (The Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies) certification and best practices.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely stated that her heart breaks with respect to the family of George Floyd.  Savannah has had similar incidents with Larry Wall, Charles Smith and David Willis.  It should have never happened.  She is so glad that Savannah has not had anything like that lately.  We are living in a time, in America, where you have to protect yourself at all costs.  Gun violence has no respect for person, place or thing.  Police brutality seems like it only hits African American males.  She is thankful that our City has adopted the policy put forth by President Obama.

Alderman Leggett indicated he is glad that Alderwoman Miller Blakely spoke on how far we have come within our City.  He thanked people like her and multiple members of Council who were activists at the time, as well as the Mayor's leadership during that time.  We established partnerships and relationships with the City and its residents to prevent these matters from happening in our City.  All lives in this City matter and young men are being a target of police training from other places.  Some police come from being soldiers, return home and look at us as people they are fighting against in the military.  He expressed appreciation for everyone's service.

Alderman Palumbo emphasized it is important for our department to have the moral courage to stand against any unethical or illegal behavior.  He thanked the Mayor for taking the time to talk about this matter.  Law enforcement is a noble calling.  When matters like this occur it errodes all positive qualities of the profession, like integrity and respect.  He offered Kudos to the Chief of Police Roy Minter for his public statement released today to take this matter on, and stating that he will use this situation as a learning opportunity for the entire department.

Alderwoman Lanier stated we have to mourn again the losing of young African American men at the hands of rogue police officers.  Gun violence is the other threat, which was recognized earlier today through a proclamation.  We have a national emergency when it comes to murder, death, and fatalities (ills of our society), with respect to what African American men are experiencing.  We have a lot of work to do.  We have to create/design an opportunity that gives them more options.  She encouraged the Councl to act in that accord.

Mayor Johnson advised that it is called Disproportionate Minority Contact.  Be clear, police officers at the end of the day, just want to be able to go home to their families.  He encouraged people of the City to follow the lawful commands when encountered by a police officer. He has been stopped in the past and he is not taking it for granted.  These matters can be handled in court at a later time.  He will help with police training and cross-cultural opportunities that may be needed to understand each other.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely advised that she is looking at the comments and members of the public want it to be acknowledged that African American females are being gunned down as well by policemen.  We have to be mindful and cognizant of what's going on in America, protect ourselves and be law abiding citizens.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #7 through #20, per the City Manager's recommendation, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

a. Alderman Palumbo moved to approve Item #21 as recommeded by the City Manager, Alderman Leggett seconded. The motion passed 6-3-0, with Alderwoman Gibson-Carter, Alderwoman Miller Blakely and Alderwoman Lanier voting no.

b. Alderwoman Gibson-Carter moved to postpone (forego approval) until we receive guaranteed maximum pricing for Item #21, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz and Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded. The motion failed 4-5-0, with Mayor Johnson, Alderman Leggett, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan, Alderman Palumbo and Alderman Purtee voting no.

Alderwoman Lanier questioned the guaranteed maximum price and whether this change impacts the scope of the project.  Lastly, she asked if we have completed one-third of the project, having expended this amount of the budget/money at this time.

The City Manager advised that this does not change the scope of the project, the design is 100% complete, and while this contract allows for approximately $23 million worth of work it is a budgeted amount to allow the awards to continue which he has to approve individually.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely inquired about the modification amounts, subcontractor bonds, construction contingencies, general conditions and CM (construction manager-at-risk) bonds.  With respect to the general liability insurance, she inquired if the City has to carry that for the construction company.

The City Manager responded to her questions and advised that this item is about bridging the gap, until the Construction Manager-at-risk provides the guranteed maximum price.  He further stated that it includes the site work, the foundation, and ordering of steel.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated these costs are questionable and are carrying out policies and decisions of the previous administration.  In trusting staff who are just doing their jobs, she wants to ensure accountability and transparency with respect to these projects.  She asked how long it will take to reach the guranteed maximum price and meeting other deadlines.

The City Manager advised there are 60 different trade packages totaling $120 million.  The impact of COVID-19 and the DBE and local goals have impacted the timeline and caused delays with reaching the guaranteed maximum price.  The absolute deadline for reaching the deadline is July, so staff can make sure that the project will remain within the budget.  The design project is 100% complete with respect to the drawings.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter asked if we have been able to realize or experience any value saving opportunities, as marketed with the engineering firm.

The City Manager advised we have experienced value savings, through work that is coordinated between the Construction Manager and Program Manager with the trade packages and to ensure the project stays within budget.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated in another agenda item with respect to the Tenenbaum's who own Chatham Steel, we are not being asked to purchase steel from them, but we are purchasing steel from outside of our City limits.

The City Manager advised Chatham Steel is providing steel for a part of it.  However, a specialized fabricator is needed as well for an arena, with more specifications and quantity that is not available locally.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter advised she is concerned about cost overruns or overages.

The City Manager advised this modification impacts two primary factors: construction costs will not exceed $120 million; and with respect to time, the arena will be complete by February 2022.

Mayor Johnson advised early release packages are not normal for this type of project.

The City Manager responded yes, early release packages are normal and not unusal.  It takes time to get construction drawings.  There are 60 different trade packages/contracts that need to be designed, bid-out, and priced.  Then there is a back-n-forth to see if any savings can be considered and the timing of deliverables, including DBE and local goals.  He described it as constant value-engineering.

Alderwoman Lanier asked what work has been completed at the 100% completion level.

The City Manager answered yes, the foundation work.  There are more than 700 piles which are 80 feet deep, and they have already been installed.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan spoke about when the Aldermen sat down with Perkins + Will in January.  During that time, it was said that there will be no cost overruns.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely advised she was reviewing the budget breakdown that was provided and she asked if some of the items were coming later.  She also asked if some of the DBEs and locals can participate with some of these items.

The City Manager advised the items she referenced will be coming out of the $120 million for construction. Yes, DBEs and locals can participate and that participation will be provided ongoing.

Mayor Johnson advised more unions are participating now and the City will soon provide and publish a dashboard on the City's website, with who is working and who is local.  This will allow the entire community to see who is working, along with racial makeups.

Alderman Palumbo stated he appreciates the Council's effort.  We have to get this thing done on time and on budget, which this action today accomplishes.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz asked about a change order for on-site improvements, then she asked why the City still does not have a guranteed maximum price.  Lastly, she asked how the delays have affected the costs.

The City Manager advised the project is $165 million and the construction costs are $120 million.  There is only a guranteed maximum price on the $120 million construction costs.  When he was involved with the Trade Center, the guaranteed maximum price occured at 6 months into the process.  The arena project is now in the ninth month of the construction and they have still not achieved the guranteed maximum price, and he attributes that to the affects of COVID-19 and attempts to get pricing.

With respect to the interior of the arena, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz does not see why we need to move forward with those things right now, given the times.  With respect to the sub tiers, subcontractors and the DBE contractors, some are being asked to give prices before the tiers above them, and then they are not being included in the packages that are being submitted.  This issue is problemsome for her and needs to be evaluated and corrected.  When packages are awarded, the DBEs in-the-end are not being included.

The City Manager indicated the balance of the items are all long-lead items, since the City has to get in-line.  Examples are the fabrications, delivery of the score board, and the ice skating part of the facility.

Mayor Johnson advised the longer you wait, the pricing is also affected.  And it will cost us money.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter asked how all of this impacts the $165 million budget.  A guaranteed maximum price was promised first in May 2019.

The City Manager advised it is staffs job to get this done within budget and on-time, with DBE and local participation.  The guaranteed maximum price was not promised or expected by staff in 2019.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter asked for the amount of the original competitive bid for AECOM.  The City Manager replied $8 million and fees.  For construction hard costs, the total is $120 million.  Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated today we still do not have guaranteed maximum contract pricing.  Given this fiscal climate, she is concerned about the possibility of cost overruns.  She asked what is the projected costs for the Canal District.  The City Manager replied that there is no budget for the Canal District.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #22 and #23, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Items #22 and #23, Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Alderwoman Lanier moved to approve Item #24, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz and Alderman Purtee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Johnson opened the alcohol license hearing for Item #25.

There were no speakers.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to continue/postpone Item #25 to the June 11, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting, Alderwoman Lanier seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Johnson opened the alcohol license hearing for Item #26.

There were no speakers.

a. Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to close the alcohol license hearing for Item #26, Alderman Purtee and Alderman Palumbo seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

b. Alderman Palumbo moved to approve Item #26, Alderman Purtee seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Alderman Purtee moved to continue/postpone Item #27 to the June 25, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Alderman Purtee asked why we are continuing to hold this particular item.

Ms. Bridget Lidy responded, but the sound was inaudible.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to continue/postpone Item #28 to the June 11, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting, Alderman Purtee and Alderwoman Lanier seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Johnson opened the alcohol license hearing for Item #29.

Speaker(s):

• Bridget Lidy, Planning and Urban Design

a. Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to close the zoning hearing for Item #29, Alderwoman Lanier and Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz thanked Ms. Lidy and the City Attorney for the work done with the Overlays in protection of our residents.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely asked for the locations of the overlays and she asked if this will make things harder for people who are coming back to get permissions with respect to alcohol licenses and privileges.  Ms. Lidy explained the distinctions.  This particular item is for existing businessess who may want to extend the alcohol types/classifications that they currently hold.  And they will not be able to add more to their classifications.  If there is a new alcohol business/license coming in, they must wait twelve months (waiting period or window) to get a new license and re-establish at that location.

Alderwoman Lanier requested clarification.  In considering this matter for Districts 2, 3 and 4, she wants to clarify with respect to District AD1, we will be revisiting some of the zoning and requirements.  From Caroline to Lathdrop on the northside of the viaduct, we want to attract investment.  Those three blocks were included in the overlay, but right now we are not talking about AD1.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz asked about a new business establishment within the Alcohol Overlay, with this amendment.  The City Attorney advised that citywide a new business can reapply for an alcohol license, if the previous owner had an alcohol license.  If the previous owner did not have an alcohol license, they cannot apply for an alcohol license at that location.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan stated that she wants to extend this Ordinance to District 3.

Mayor Johnson opened the alcohol license hearing for Item #30.

Speaker(s):

• Bridget Lidy, Planning and Urban Design - correction of NewZo

a. Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to close the zoning hearing for Item #30, Alderman Leggett seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Johnson opened the alcohol license hearing for Item #31, within District 5.

Speaker(s):

• Bridget Lidy, Planning and Urban Design

a. Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to close the zoning hearing for Item #31, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

After the first reading was consdered the second, and a request that an ordinance be placed and passed upon its adoption, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Item #32, Alderwoman Lanier and Alderman Palumbo seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

After the first reading was consdered the second, and a request that an ordinance be placed and passed upon its adoption, Alderman Leggett moved to approve Item #33, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

After the first reading was consdered the second, and a request that an ordinance be placed and passed upon its adoption, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Item #34, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

This property is in District 5, not 6 as listed on the agenda.

Alderman Leggett moved to approve Item #35, Mayor Pro-Tem Shabazz and Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Speaker(s):

• City Manager Pat Monahan - closing of streets (33rd and 36th) and reduction of train noise
• Virginia Mobley - safety improvements and requested the matter to move forward

Alderman Palumbo moved to approve Item #36, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Alderman Palumbo stated we have a special National Historic Landmark District, as an entire City not just an individual landmark.  He and Alderman Leggett spoke to Chatham County and the Historic District Board of Review on this issue.  Along with Chatham County, we are going to opt back-in to the design process.

City Manager Monahan advised that earlier today he corrected the Resolution around the issue of violations and he identified the issues that need to be addressed.

Alderman Palumbo moved to approve Item #37, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

City Manager Monahan advised this matter assists with getting more outside seating/outdoor dining.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan moved to approve Item #38, Alderman Leggett seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

City Manager Monahan detailed the locations impacted.

a. Alderman Purtee moved to approve Item #39, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan and Alderman Leggett seconded.  The motion passed, 7-2-0, with Alderwoman Gibson-Carter and Alderwoman Miller Blakely voting no.

b. Alderwoman Gibson-Carter moved to amend motion a., by including an audit (wages and scholarships) which the company will be required to submit and be entered upon the record, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz and Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded.  (No vote was taken on the motion.)

c. Alderwoman Gibson-Carter moved to postpone/continue Item #39 until there is an understanding around wages and auditing, Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded.  The motion failed, 2-7-0, with Alderwoman Gibson-Carter and Alderwoman Miller Blakely voting yes.  Mayor Johnson, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz, Alderwoman Lanier, Alderman Leggett, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan, Alderman Palumbo, and Alderman Purtee voted no.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz explained and detailed information that she heard pertaining to the impact of the project.  She inquired how the City Manager quantifies the drain that this project will have on the City.

The City Manager presented a few slides: P3 Partnership: Owner, SEDA, City of Savannah; Financial Analysis - First 10 Years; and, Financial Analysis - Second 10 Years.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz detailed the following for the record:

• Design, construction, goods and services, opportunity for business development and warehousing, and e-commerce will follow City purchasing policies, including local DBE and local goals.

She further advised in the development agreement on page 7, number 14, regarding City Manager approval:

• The parties acknowledge that the parties may need to execute one or more amendments to this agreement, the IGA and the water & sewer agreements, which amendments shall provide greater detail with respect to the rights, fees and obligations of the parties thereof.  The approval of this agreement by the City shall be deemed to authorize the City Manager, subject to the City Council's approval to execute any such amendments that are substantially forbearance of the terms and conditions contained therein, shall not exceed the parameters provided by Section II therein, nor decrease the obligations of the parties in this agreement.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz asked the City Manager to talk about the scholarships.

City Manager Monahan advised to enhance job opportunities, he researched the average wages.  He further added the average jobs are from $16 to $17 an hour, upwards of $38,000/year, primarily forklift drivers.  There will be 10 million square feet of warehousing.  For every million square feet, the City of Savannah will provide 100 scholarships at Savannah Tech for a one-day training, to become a certified forklift driver.  For two million square feet, there will be 1000 scholarships, exclusively for City of Savannah residents.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely asked if we are giving bonds for this project.  The City Manager replied no.  Bonds will be issued through the Savannah Economic Development Authority (SEDA), but for public improvements.  The City of Savannah will be obligated to co-sign the bonds.  She then asked when will the project be completed.  The City Manager advised three years for the Interchange.  Alderwoman Miller Blakely then asked when will the residents be told about the project which is in their backyard.  The City Manager advised that the project has been zoned manufacturing for 15 years and the residents live within the unincorporated area of the County.

Alderman Purtee stated we have an opportunity knocking at our doors that will never happen again, whereupon he moved to approve the agenda item.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter indicated she wants an audit to make sure the contractor will follow through with the details in the agreement.  She wants the wages to be spelled out.  She wants to track the scholarships that are given out and how they comply with the agreement.  She expressed concern with the amount of money invested in bonds, as compared to the previous administration.  She wants the footprint and behaviors to look different than the previous administration.  In addition to extending bonds to corporate, the current administration should blend our bonds to address our needs for transitional housing for families.  She wants to put stronger teeth to the guarantees.  The audit should be either annually or bi-annually, but contingent on the benefits.  She wants a blanket policy for every bond dollar that the City of Savannah or one of our partners extends, i.e., . community benefits and assurances related to their promises.  She wants to know if they are doing what they said they were going to do, one-year, two-years, or three years down the road.  We have expensive hotels built by contractors with a promise of jobs that are low-paying for our citizens who are cleaning toilets and making beds for $8 and $9/hour.  She wants to take necessary steps within our local government, but the footprint has to be different.

The City Manager advised all of the benefits in this particular action have to be provided by the City of Savannah, who totally controls this project.  It is truly a public, private project.  Rockingham Farms will provide the land at the Interchange and then they are out of it.  Rockingham Farms will provide a five-year guarantee, if the PILOT payments do not generate sufficient funds for the bond payment for up-to five years.  The key to this project is to get the first three-million square feet.  Once developed, it is sufficient to cover the bonds, even if the City does not get another warehouse built.

Mayor Johnson asked if there was a way to ensure that they are going to do what they say they will do.  The City Manager responded that the City controls the scholarships.  He further stated the in-house auditing team can provide annual audit services, like how much is collected through the PILOT, debt service, jobs, scholarships and average payroll.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz suggested Alderwoman Gibson-Carter's ideas be incorporated in the agreement, with respect to what the City does, including periodic audit reports submitted to the City Council.  Dr. Shabazz repeated her comments with respect to particular wording she requested earlier to be included as a part of the development agreement.

Alderwoman Lanier indicated without a community benefits ordinance, she feels we are moving towards that through this P3 arrangement.  She can see some improvement, so she stands ready to support the project.  It has been a long road within this market.  It is not perfect yet, so considering Dr. Shabazz's tweeks/language and Alderwoman Gibson-Carter's community benefits for people like taking care of the least of these.  We do want to go back-n-forth to negotiate concessions to achieve something we all can live with, and create a community benefit environment.

Mayor Johnson stated we know that education is the way out of poverty, when people are able to make higher wages they can come out of poverty.

Alderman Purtee stated anytime you have a P3 project, it is not just that company involved.  In this case as the City Manager stated, the City is controling a lot.  There is a risk, but we need to take a chance.  There is also no guarantee all homeless people in the City of Savannah are going to get a job.  These are good wage jobs and a source of revenue for the City.  Rather than compare ourselves with the previous administration, we need to be more creative.  He applauded City Manager Monahan for what he has done.  The opportunity will not come again.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely stated she is concerned about this project, there is not enough teeth.  She does not want another lobbyist situation where someone is being paid but not performing the job.  While the jobs are good, it is not going to be developed for another two or three years.  She asked how much the scholarships are going to be.  Mayor Johnson replied the price of the class at Savannah Tech is free-of-charge, participants receive a scholarship to become a certified forklift driver.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated she wants to see a plan or a promise that is essentially recession, pandemic and natural disaster proof.  With respect to opportunities, people love doing business with the City of Savannah.  If someone goes away, there will be someone to come behind them to take their place.  The City of Savannah is open for business.  In the future, she asks the City Manager to have conversation and dialogue when the plans are being put together.  An enormous amount of work has been conducted relating to the community benefits, but she believes the Mayor and Aldermen should have had some input and involvement as well, due to the unique relationship elected officials have with the residents.

After the vote, Mayor Johnson stated to the City Manager that the body expects a plan for accountability.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan moved to approve Item #40, Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Alderman Palumbo moved to approve Item #41, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed, 5-4-0, with Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz, Alderwoman Gibson-Carter. Alderwoman Miller Blakely and Alderwoman Lanier voting no.

Alderwoman Lanier stated our backs are up against the wall, in terms of this deal for today only.  We get better policy when we share ideas and go back-n-forth.  From what she heard today, we are getting a hybrid, possibly a better deal.  Savannah is open for business, and she believes we can structure a better deal after today.  We are really close in getting something that is good for the community, equity and balance.  She is not in a position yet to support this matter, we need to postpone this and get some more public involvement.

The City Manager indicated that this has been a long, lingering process with staff.  Council members have made suggestions that have been included in the lease agreement. The lease agreement extends the current agreement another five years, locking it into a 10-year agreement which saves the City because the annual lease payment decreases during that period.  The surface lot is the cornerstone to other parking that can still be developed as a hybrid (surface and structured) for all parking.  The City is in negotiations about structured parking.  There is concern out there that the arena still needs parking.  He recommended adopting parking provisions sooner than later.

Alderwoman Lanier stated environmental justice research was done as far back as 2004, and surface parking lots are very detrimental to drainage especially where there are no trees.  These concerns have not been worked out yet.  She is looking for more equitable and environmentally friendly solution.  None of the large developments occurring in the City are planning for the use of large surface lots.  With a little more work, we can have a better solution.

Mayor Johnson advised if we do nothing, we still have a lease.  With this opportunity, we have a chance to get $1.6 million back, and put the property back on the tax rolls.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter indicated the project is questionable and dubious, in that parking considerations were not properly considered when the location of the arena was established.  The City Manager advised that the original intent was structured parking, but staff believed that the cost of structured parking was a risk.  He further stated that surface parking was the best option to staff, and the family (who owns the lot) has grown weary over the years.  The owner also has a bona fide offer for a distribution warehouse.  Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated that a parking solution should have been solidified prior to identifying a location for the arena.  She asked for the cost to develop the lot.  The City Manager replied $5.9 million.

Mayor Johnson repeated we already have a five-year lease agreement for 22.5 acres at a higher rate, but by extending the lease, save money during the lease and getting the benefit of tax payments on the lease, which he believes is more favorable for the City.  If we do nothing, we still have a lease and we pay more for it.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated that Mr. Bell advised her that the City is in a due diligence period, but the Mayor is advised that we already have a contract at a cost of $696,000/year.  This is a five-year lease, with an option for another five-year lease to renew.  Mr. Bell further advised that staff is requesting the City Council to change that lease agreement, in an effort to lower the lease payments from $696,000/year to $525,000/year over a ten-year lease period, thereby creating a savings and giving more time to recoup the City's costs.  She asked if the City is generating any income from the deal and Mr. Bell replied yes.  Mr. Bell further advised that staff intends for people to arrive at the Arena in other means then cars, with a planned trail expansion along with ride sharing.  Payments on the parking will begin in August of this year.  Alderwoman Gibson-Carter then asked why the City is taking on the ownership of the parking area when the Tenenbaum's may find the payments to be attractive.  Mr. Bell replied that the Tenenbaum's are not interested in that business of parking, and they have turned-down other more lucrative offers.  Alderwoman Gibson-Carter asked Mr. Bell if the Arena project is viable without the Canal District project being developed.  Mr. Bell replied we need some improvements around the Arena project in order to be successful.

Alderman Palumbo encouraged everyone to revisit the Canal District Master Plan/study performed by Perkins + Will.   He asked Mr. Grant about parking during that time and he believes transporation is going to change drastically over the next decade and this site gives us that flexibility.  Between saving taxpayers $171,000/year and collecting taxes on this site, he belives this is a no-brainer.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz advised that she respects the District (1) Alderwoman's position.

Alderwoman Lanier moved to postpone/continue Item #42 for 60 days indefinitely, Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded.  (Mayor Johnson made a friendly amendment to postpone Item #42 indefinitely, and Alderwoman Lanier accepted the friendly amendment.)  The motion as amended passed unanimously.

The City Manager advised staff's thinking/intent regarding this proposal is to issue an RFP, in order to find a private partner for the development.  The project is intended to establish a community market, which will cater to local goods and services.

Alderwoman Lanier thanked everyone for their work put-in regarding this project and the meetings that were held and attended.  A petition was received by the Clerk with 400 signatures from people who want to postpone this initiative, with an interest for more community input.  She asked what is the policy that will lend or create this type of decision.  She believes that it is important to handle this correctly, with the inclusion of community stakeholders, prior to agreeing to a P3 arrangement.

Mayor Johnson agreed with Alderwoman Lanier; however, he feels that it will be more than 60 days particularly due to COVID-19.

a. Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Item #43, Alderwoman Miller Blakely and Alderwoman Lanier seconded.  (No vote was taken on the motion.)

b. Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve Item #43, with a friendly amendment made by Mayor Johnson to allow the City Manager to fine tune the RFP options by generalizing it and issue a general RFP on how to utilize the property, Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

The City Manager advised that he drafted/developed the RFP, along with suggestions from Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz, requiring the developer to draft a Master Plan that must be approved by the City Council before development begins.  The goals include economic development, job opportunities, and as a community asset to the neighborhood.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz thanked citizens and neighborhood presidents for their consistent work, since 2015.  Input was given through survey's, town hall meetings, community business leaders and clergy, planning/briefing meetings, the previous City Council and City Manager's, and reviewing other City's successful similar developments in urban areas.  The development of the Fairgrounds includes film, television, sound stages, technology and music, music studios, complementary retail, commercial development, recreation, fitness and wellness facilities, small police precinct, and other uses.  The uses meet numerous strategic plan objectives of the City, adopted by the City Council.  We propose a best-in-class development of the 65.5 acres site via an RFP for the Fairgrounds.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter asked the City Manager to make sure we build into these deals an audit to ensure we make good on the promises contained within them.  She stated her attempts to get bond deal policies and contractual agreement policies on the agenda and establishing an audit process for these types of deals.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan advised that this land was bought by the last administration for affordable housing, but now from listening to the Fifth District Alderwoman, that is not what her people want at this time.  The same process used for Rockingham should be applicable to this project.  Quantitative data has not been provided with regards to how we will achieve the goals that were outlined, nor who is going to partner with them to achieve the goals.  Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan requested more details.  How will we get from point A to C, given no concrete details. She does not see any boxes to check, other than what has been told.  What livable jobs are there going to be?  Given the pandemic, coronavirus and boycotting of the film industry, she does not see any jobs being made.  With respect to quality of life issues, the Fairgrounds is in the middle of a community and film crews work all night long.

Alderman Purtee stated he sees a lot of potential with this project, and he would like to see a workshop presentation dedicated to this matter.  He requested to push the item to the next meeting, so he can wrap his head around some of the information being put out.

Mayor Johnson indicated that he is familiar with the project, since its inception in the beginning of 2015 and the end of 2014, when the City Manager was Stephanie Cutter.  She introduced the concept of the Fairgrounds.  Admittedly, more was paid for the property than what the property was worth, but it was a strategic property for the City of Savannah to have/own.  We have been talking about affordable housing which is affordable for people to live for quite sometime.  Ms. Cutter found this property as an opportunity for people to do housing, as well as leisure and recreation.  It also created an opportunity to connect that corridor back to Tatemville, recreating a street grid and a variety of things.  Out of 67 acres, 40 acres was in a flood plain at the time and will be deemed unusable.  Mayor Johnson's concerns are he has not seen a community process explored in this project, and all members have identified affordable housing as a priority.  He suggested the City Council to take a step back, and create an opportunity to hold a public, transparent process by which the land will be properly evaluated, options evaluated.  What Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan says about the film industry is true.  At one point the film industry was bustling and now it is flat.  We have to look at long-term viability to know if this is something to go forth.  This Council and the public should have the ability to weigh-in, across the city, since this property was bought with money from all over the city.  Therefore, we should approach and look at things as a city.  Mayor Johnson recommended that a process be established through the City Manager, where the land will be evaluated by professionals, along with recommendations regarding the uses through a public process.  When the findings are complete, they should be brought to the Mayor and Aldermen for a decision regarding what the body wants to do.  Mayor Johnson indicated that he believes this is a similar process to the water works project, with real-time data and transparency.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely advised that she has been dealing with this particular situation for a couple of years now, as a neighborhood association advisor and as a resident of the fifth district.  We were clear then that we did not want housing in that area.  Each time this particular property comes up there are questions.  We are asking for an RFP to develop this project.  The community and the residents have spoken, and they said that they do not want affordable housing in their neighborhood for they are already dealing with Montgomery Landings and they need an economic driver in the area.  The Fairground project will be very beneficial.  They have signed petitions and they have written letters, including the neighborhood association presidents.  They have asked us to vote on this matter tonight, like we did for Rockingham Farms and other projects.  Something as viable as this can be voted upon.

Alderman Palumbo echoed the Mayor pertaining to getting everyone's input, in that this property was purchased for the people of Savannah and he would like to see what ideas spring forth.  This is an exciting opportunity to bring all of our neighborhoods together, and he would like to be involved.  He lives one mile away from the site.  

Alderman Purtee agreed with Alderwoman Miller Blakely in saying that the people have spoken and they do not want housing over there.  He asked if this item has been brought up at a workshop.  Mayor Johnson replied no.  Alderman Purtee advised that he wants to be more informed regarding this item, like Rockingham or the Wedge property, and others.  He is okay with waiting a week or two to reconsider this matter, and he understands that no one wants affordable housing over there.  He requested to have a presentation first.

Mayor Johnson advised that the interesting thing is we are saying that no one wants housing, affordable housing is a misnomer.  The property was purchased for housing for people to live, not low-income housing.  When people learned that the housing was single family dwellings, people were okay with it.  It is very important for people to be clear with what options exist.  Places for people to live is important.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated this is about an economic opportunity for a neighborhood, not the NIMBY syndrome.  She stated to the City Manager her concern with holding partners accountable through the use of an audit, utilizing a compliance process.  The Fairgrounds project was introduced prior to any of the other projects that have been approved, like Rockingham and the bond issued to Chatham County government.  Nothing has been presented for economic drivers to serve the most impoverished residents of Savannah, or bringing people out of poverty, and we are mimicking the footprints of the previous administration.  She urged everyone to change the footprints, to include placing a heart in the decisions being made, and to be more fair and balanced.  We cannot pick and choose when we want to be transparent.  Alderwoman Gibson-Carter stated that the project, which lies in the Fifth District where most of the homicide crime occurs, and we all agree that we need to eradicate and erode poverty.  Failing to take advantage of this project does not speak well to addressing our priorities.  Since January, we have been doing business for other people, not for the citizens of Savannah.  Her position is to move forward with parameters consistent with incorporating an audit, no respect to project.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz explained to Alderman Purtee and the other members that we need to move forward to release an RFP, so that a developer can come and then create a master plan.  The master plan can be used to have charrettees and go around to communities, using the format of a public private partnership.  She asked members of the City Council to vote on this matter tonight, given the RFP has been out for seven days for anyone from the public to see.  Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz asked the Clerk of Council to read into the record comments received from the public.  The Mayor replied not at this time.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan stated for the record that she did not say she would vote for or against this project, she requested details.  We listened to details about Rockingham for six hours, but none can be asked with respect to this project.  It is very disparaging when people say that she is blocking economic development.  For the record, she is for economic development, but she is for a plan.  She stands for doing what is right, what is prudent, what is fair, and what is transparent all across the board.

Alderman Purtee made statements pertaining to transparency and comments made pertaining to the previous administration.  He asked to see a presentation on the Fairgrounds, like those he received regarding the other development projects.  He wants to make sure that all i's are dotted and all t's are crossed, nor make mistakes of past administrations.  He wants to keep moving and looking forward.

Mayor Johnson stated that he would support an RFP that was not tailored to certain things.  He would rather say in the RFP, there is 67 acres of land which 40 acres is within a flood plain, what can you do or propose within those parameters, and it gives the City Council a variety of options to look at.  It could be economic, it could be housing, it could be whatever.  He recommends making it very broad, and ask the developers to give us some options from which to choose from.  He asked is that possible, or an effective middle road, allowing time for public input and giving us something to put on the street to move this project forward.

The City Manager restated that staff could re-draft the RFP to make it something more open-ended, and allow the open market to determine how the property will be used.

Mayor Johnson advised this will give everybody something to consider, a middle ground to allow the City Council to own the process, and secondly to allow an RFP to be put on the streets.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely stated that she does not see a problem with the RFP naming specific things.  She feels that something else is going on here, but she cannot put her finger on it.  She sees the project as an opportunity to knock down the poverty level, and she does not see why anybody would be against something as important as this project.  The neighborhood presidents wrote letters and petitions.  She requested to allow the community the opportunity to have an economic driver.

Mayor Johnson advised that the presidents of the neighborhood associations are telling him they are kinda confused about what is going on.  He would like for an RFP to be put-out and then the Council gets to own the process and decide what is going to go there.  Some ideas may be knocked off immediately and others may be more viable, but it gives us a starting point.

Alderwoman Lanier asked and commented the following: many of the neighborhoods are advocating for area plans that can fit into the master plans, and this has been neglected in the black neighborhoods; allowing a developer or an RFP respondent to create a plan is doing business the old way which hasn't worked, and it is going against what the community asks for; developments that come close to neighborhoods should be resident, citizen and community-driven;  we don't need to go out and fight developers who are motivated by profit to come into the neighborhoods and decide what they think might be best for those people; and, the residents have to remain the primary stakeholders.

The City Manager will start the legal advertising the middle of next week, with 60 days or so for responses.  There will be a two-week evaluation, so you should have proposals back within three months.  Definitive proposals will be accepted, so that the Council can evaluate them to determine the future use of that property.

Mayor Johnson suggested to then take ideas to the community, pair them down, and ultimately determine which one fits the best needs and desires of the community and the City Council.

The City Manager responded to the Mayor, you want to open up your options.  With all options on the table, you will discuss it with the community and then make a decision.  The Mayor responded correct and he asked the City Manager to give a timeline when he releases it. 

When first presented with this opportunity from Dr. Shabazz, Alderwoman Gibson-Carter advised that we were in executive session and it was decided that we needed to hear from the people.  So we heard from the people.  Then it was decided that we needed to have a survey.  We moved passed the survey and arrived here today.  Alderwoman Gibson-Carter pointed out behaviors exhibited with this project is really not consistent with the spirit of why we are all here. This is so very disappointing.  We heard from dozens of people in that community, and we have factual crime and poverty data in that community.  We have this opportunity, and all it takes is a single decision for an RFP.  Now we enter into a game, where the City Manager will go and tweak or change the language.  And she predicts we will end up with an arrangement with an external partner who will back door their way into hijacking this opportunity from this community.  She wanted to put this out there and if she is wrong, she will happily be wrong and accept being wrong.  We can never move forward, if we are still mimicking behaviors from the past. Until that changes, she is not going to change because that is not what she came here to do.  Keeping impoverished people down, promoting poverty and not doing anything about crime is by design. There are a select few individuals that are entrenched in this community, who run Savannah, and who are currently running City Hall.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz stated we have to get this thing moving.  She will continue to keep this thing in front of you and you will be involved totally, speaking to the community presidents and others listening.  She feels that the vote today will help this to move a little bit, and not let it stay stagnant.  This is an opportunity to get us to move.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely asked what happened to the public comment received from the community.

Mayor Johnson asked the Clerk of Council to summarize the comments made regarding this agenda item.  In relation to the Clerk of Council's summary, housing is not included in the issuance of the RFP.  He reiterated to the City Manager a request to issue a timeline.  The City Manager advised he normally includes a timeline within the RFP, with neighborhood discussions being included in this project.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter recused herself and left the Zoom meeting room.

a. Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan moved to approve and accept Item #44, Alderman Palumbo seconded.  The motion and the second were later withdrawn.

b. Alderwoman Lanier moved to postpone indefinitely Item #44, Alderwoman Miller Blakely and Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz seconded.  The motion passed 8-0-1, with Alderwoman Gibson-Carter recusing herself.

Alderwoman Lanier expressed her displeasure with not being able to speak about the project within her district, prior to the motion being made.  People from SCAD, who were dealing with the past Council, are likely watching this discussion intently.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter asked to recuse herself from the discussion and the vote.

Alderwoman Lanier indicated that the last Council entered into some type of deal concerning this Wedge property, which included swapping some properties.  400 people signed a petition indicating that they were not interested in the previous deal (swap) happening.  We want SCAD to have what they want, but this is an opportunity for us to get what we need.  In this post COVID-19 situation of looking at the economics and how we are going to recover, this piece of property is a key bargaining property for what the people need. In the letters that came and the proposal that was signed, they wish to discuss this property in relation to what happened with the market.  This is an opportunity to have a discussion regarding the property.  With respect to the strategic priority, this project was listed under Good Government, but should have been listed under Neighborhood Revitalization.  The matter of swapping property was listed under Neighborhood Revitalization, but should have been listed under Good Government.  It is backwards.  Alderwoman Lanier wishes to leverage benefits for the community, a First District asset.  She asked to postpone the project, asking further what is the urgency.  The property is an essential tool for bargaining and leveraging a community asset.  The people have requested alternatives.  She is concerned the people are always feeling like they are fighting the City government, elected officials and staff.  The people are the bosses and the primary stakeholders.  When staff brings solutions, they do not bring alternatives.  So the elected officials are not setting policy when staff brings only one solution to rubber stamp.  Alderwoman Lanier advised that she needs to be a part of the discussions and the people need to be part of the discussions.  We need an economic piece which is a life and death situation.  SCAD has agreed they will partner on the project, with the market and the entrepreneurial center.  We need a true community partnership. She asked Council to vote against the original motion and take more time and have further discussion.  This will allow for a better vision to determine the best and higher use to benefit the community.

Mayor Johnson stated the appraisal from SCAD is based on an appraised value of $5.5 million.  If the City agrees, the payment will be escrowed into a City account and drawn down by SCAD to build something of that value for whatever the City determined it was going to be.  It is not a swap anymore.   We only have six (6) City properties left.  He is looking at the property from a housing lens.  He and the City Manager have talked about this and SCAD is working their plan.  He is not sure that we have much of a plan.  It is a strategic property for them, in spite of all indications that the property has dropped in value.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely asked if there is a substitute motion from Alderwoman Lanier to table this matter.  And if there is she would like to second the substitute motion.

Alderman Purtee stated while SCAD has been a great partner, he believed that the Council should table this matter to find some solutions and have further discussion.  We are on the right track with SCAD and he does not want to hastily trade property back and forth.  We need to look long-term, where is the money going to be used and do we want to do this deal or not.  Given the long day, he recommended tabling the decision.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan stated for the record, she does not vote for anything she doesn't know about.  She reads the summary and cannot be told what she knows and does not know.

Alderman Palumbo stated we are evaluating a proposal from an assessment made prior to COVID-19.  He evaluated turning this property over to private hands.  He is most concerned about turning this property over to a nonprofit and taking it off of the tax rolls.  Compared to other properties downtown, SCAD is talking about a 12-story building, this would net the City $70,000/year in revenue.  The City has a lot of different leases out there (City buildings), we are evaluating a proposal for an entrepreneurial center, and we can't go pick up money trees.  We can continue this matter if more discussion is needed.  He asked the City Manager and the City Attorney to get more information by the next meeting, evaluating a special tax district if the property goes to SCAD.  He is interested in looking at the property as a revenue source.  The City Manager in conferring with the City Attorney believes they can look into the question further.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz agreed with Alderwoman Lanier, Alderman Purtee and Alderwoman Miller Blakely that we need to table this matter and come back at a later date, especially with regard to what the City Manager said and conferred with the City Attorney.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan rescinded her motion.  As the seconder, Alderman Palumbo agreed.

Mayor Johnson stated that the City does not have a plan and he does not fault SCAD, who has been a good partner, for working their plan.

Alderwoman Lanier stated we have a housing issue and we are going to be working to have better outcomes.  Riding through the neighborhoods in the First District, we have a condition that has never happened, since 1865, five to nine empty houses per block.  We have not dealt with the vacant housing sitting within these neighborhoods.  We should conduct these meetings in decency and in order, and I am very passionate about what happens because we have an opportunity and a lot of people are depending on me.  If we build wealth and health, it will take care of the poverty.  Comments made by Alderman Palumbo is the thinking and the comments we need to have.  She did not want to steam roll through and not give the people who have been interested in this matter to have an opportunity to work through it.

Mayor Johnson stated to Alderwoman Lanier that he appreciated her apology.  He also thanked Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan for rescinding her motion.  It is very late and we are all very tired.  None of us can change things by ourselves, if we are going to do it, we have to do it together.

Alderwoman Wilder-Bryan stated that in Victory Heights, Avondale and Holly Heights the same thing going on in the First District is going on in the Third District.  All of us are passionate for our districts.  It would be unfair to think that four or five houses are not vacant other places, I have that in my district too.

Mayor Pro-Tem Dr. Shabazz moved to approve #45 (Settlement #1), Alderwoman Lanier and Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

[Authorized the City Attorney to settle/resolve the case of Jerome Mitchell v. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah for $90,000.00, resulting from an automobile accident with a City of Savannah truck.]

Alderwoman Lanier moved to approve Item #46, Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter advised the City Manager that she has proposed legislation pertaining to Impact Fees somewhere on his desk or within the queue.  Given that there are not many more spaces to build on in Savannah, she asked how would/could impact fees provide support to us in this regard of a major subdivision.

The City Manager advised if the impact fees ordinance already existed, the City would be able to levy that for one of six or seven different types of improvements.  The City already requires the developer to provide the water and sewer within the subdivision, all streets have to meet City requirements and specifications.  The other options would be the creation of a school.  Recreation would be allowed under the impact fee ordinance.  The difference here, which sounds like it is large, is 12 acres but only 36 lots. Normally an impact fee ordinance would have more affect, impact and a draw on City services if the property is at least 500 acres. Also any fees that the City collects must be used in that area, and within three years per State law.  Along with the community benefits ordinance, staff is pursuing an impact fee ordinance which does require the appointment of an advisory committee and a number of other requirements.  He does not believe this agenda item or the next one warrants it, but it will be good for the City to have the ordinances on the books for future purposes.  The City of Savannah lost the opportunity to have a real impact with an impact fee ordinance at least 12 to 15 years ago.  It would have been perfect for the Highlands, New Hampstead, and a number of much larger subdivisions.

Mayor Johnson advised Alderwoman Lanier that there is a possible opportunity to create a special district in the Highlands for the additional services that some people want there.  We can have a conversation about it offline.

Alderwoman Lanier moved to approve Item #47, Alderwoman Miller Blakely seconded.  The motion passed unanimously.

Alderwoman Lanier commented a City employee (Lillian Baptiste) will be retiring today.  She is loved by the City and the community. 

Mayor Johnson stated she is a phenomenal representative and he hates to see her go.  She is a star.  In her honor I will say, minute by minute...minute by minute, hour by hour...you lose your past, you lose your power.

Alderwoman Gibson-Carter offered condolences to a fallen City of Savannah staffer, Mr. Arthur Rivers, III.

Alderwoman Miller Blakely asked the Mayor if they can talk about the Summer 500 program at the next City Council Meeting.  He replied yes.

Hearing no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 11:18 p.m.

The audio recording of the Council Meeting can be found by copying and inserting the below link in your url:

https://savannahgovtv.viebit.com/player.php?hash=TzaFhB5fN7JH

Mark Massey, Clerk of Council

Date Minutes Approved: June 11, 2020

Initials:  mm